Your Pilot InterviewATPL EASA

Aerofoils, pressure and angle of attack

Connect pressure distribution, downwash and the lift curve without the equal-transit-time myth.

How a wing changes the flow

The pressure field and the downward momentum in the wake are two compatible descriptions of the same interaction.

One mechanism, two useful views

The wing establishes a pressure distribution around its surface and turns the surrounding airflow. Integrating pressure and shear gives the aerodynamic force; examining momentum change in a control volume gives the same resultant.

Air parcels separated at the leading edge do not have to meet at the trailing edge. Faster upper-surface flow is compatible with lower static pressure, but Bernoulli alone does not specify the complete flow field.

Angle of attack and shape

Angle of attack α is the angle between the aerofoil chord and relative airflow. Pitch attitude is measured against the horizon. A climbing aircraft can have the same α as a level aircraft with a different pitch attitude.

Camber shifts the lift curve so positive lift can exist at zero geometric α. A symmetric section approximately has zero lift at zero α under ideal symmetric flow. Changes in Reynolds or Mach number can change the curve.

Distinguish pitch from the wing’s flow angle

Consider an aircraft with pitch attitude +8° on a +3° flight path. In the aligned two-dimensional geometry, α is +5°. If the aircraft instead follows a −2° path with the same pitch attitude, α becomes +10°. The horizon picture is identical, but the relative flow meets the wing at twice the angle.

That comparison does not prove that lift doubles. On a cambered aerofoil, zero geometric α may already have positive CL, and the lift curve may be nonlinear near separation. Lift also depends on q and area. Geometry identifies α; the appropriate coefficient curve and the actual flow condition establish the force.

When explaining a pressure diagram, identify the undisturbed airflow, the chord, and the pressure difference over each surface. Avoid assuming that only the upper surface contributes. Both upper and lower pressures, integrated over the surface with their directions, form the net force. The wake’s downward momentum is a compatible check of that complete interaction.

Use the lift coefficient as a requirement

CL packages geometry and flow effects. It is a dimensionless coefficient, not an independent source of lift.

From force to coefficient

L = qSCL. If the aircraft must support a specified load, CL required = L/(qS). Reducing speed at constant required lift demands a larger CL, normally obtained by increasing α before stall.

For the fictional 100 kN load, 30 m² wing and q = 2,000 Pa, CL required = 100,000/(2,000 × 30) = 1.667. The coefficient is dimensionless; qS carries the newtons.

The finite limit matters

The approximately straight part of a lift curve cannot be extended indefinitely. Near stall, separation changes the relationship. A calculated CL requirement above available CLmax means the stated steady condition cannot be maintained.

The laboratory uses a supplied linear slope and a rounded illustrative stall curve. Its critical angle is a teaching parameter, not a universal aircraft stall angle or a usable warning threshold.

Find the minimum speed for a supplied coefficient

A fictional wing has S = 30 m² and must provide 90 kN of lift at density 1.20 kg/m³. If the largest permitted coefficient in this exercise is 1.5, the minimum speed satisfying that coefficient is √[2 × 90,000/(1.20 × 30 × 1.5)] = 57.74 m/s. This is an inverse load equation, not a complete approach-speed calculation.

At 70 m/s the required CL is 90,000/(0.5 × 1.20 × 70² × 30) = 1.020. At 50 m/s the requirement becomes 2.0 and exceeds the supplied capability. Increasing the requested coefficient in a calculation cannot manufacture attached-flow lift once the available maximum has been passed.

Use the laboratory’s required-CL line to locate the attached-branch intersection, then deliberately set a requirement above the supplied peak. There is no valid intersection on the rising branch. State the missing condition clearly: the chosen geometry and flow cannot provide the specified supported load at that q. A different speed, load or configuration is needed.

Can you explain and apply the mechanism?

Four original questions. Work from the stated facts, then compare your reasoning with the explanation.

Your learning

Progress saved in this browser. Log in to sync across devices.

Learning overview